五月天青色头像情侣网名,国产亚洲av片在线观看18女人,黑人巨茎大战俄罗斯美女,扒下她的小内裤打屁股

歡迎光臨散文網(wǎng) 會員登陸 & 注冊

Teaching styles

2022-01-08 09:34 作者:劍哥備課筆記  | 我要投稿


https://resilienteducator.com/classroom-resources/5-types-of-classroom-teaching-styles/

The Authority, or lecture style

The authority model is teacher-centered and frequently entails lengthy lecture sessions or one-way presentations. Students are expected to take notes or absorb information.

  • Pros: This style is acceptable for certain higher-education disciplines and auditorium settings with large groups of students. The pure lecture style is most suitable for subjects like history, which necessitate memorization of key facts, dates, names, etc.

  • Cons: It’s a questionable model for teaching children because there is little or no interaction with the teacher. Plus it can get a little snooze-y. That’s why it’s a better approach for older, more mature students.

The Demonstrator, or coach style

The demonstrator retains the formal authority role by showing students what they need to know. The demonstrator is a lot like the lecturer, but their lessons include multimedia presentations, activities, and demonstrations. (Think: Math. Science. Music.)

  • Pros: This style gives teachers opportunities to incorporate a variety of formats including lectures and multimedia presentations.

  • Cons: Although it’s well-suited for teaching mathematics, music, physical education, or arts and crafts, it is difficult to accommodate students’ individual needs in larger classrooms.

The Facilitator, or activity style

Facilitators promote self-learning and help students develop critical thinking skills and retain knowledge that leads to self-actualization.

  • Pros: This style trains students to ask questions and helps develop skills to find answers and solutions through exploration; it is ideal for teaching science and similar subjects.

  • Cons: Challenges teacher to interact with students and prompt them toward discovery rather than lecturing facts and testing knowledge through memorization. So it’s a bit harder to measure success in tangible terms.

The Delegator, or group style

The delegator style is best suited for curricula that require lab activities, such as chemistry and biology, or subjects that warrant peer feedback, like debate and creative writing.

  • Pros: Guided discovery and inquiry-based learning place the teacher in an observer role that inspires students by working in tandem toward common goals.

  • Cons: Considered a modern style of teaching, it is sometimes criticized as eroding teacher authority. As a delegator, the teacher acts more as a consultant rather than the traditional authority figure.

The Hybrid, or blended style

Hybrid, or blended style, follows an integrated approach to teaching that blends the teacher’s personality and interests with students’ needs and curriculum-appropriate methods.

  • Pros: Inclusive! And it enables teachers to tailor their styles to student needs and appropriate subject matter.

  • Cons: Hybrid style runs the risk of trying to be too many things to all students, prompting teachers to spread themselves too thin and dilute learning.

Because teachers have styles that reflect their distinct personalities and curriculum—from math and science to English and history—it’s crucial that they remain focused on their teaching objectives and avoid trying to be all things to all students.


Teaching styles的評論 (共 條)

分享到微博請遵守國家法律
盘山县| 株洲县| 皋兰县| 繁昌县| 行唐县| 资溪县| 泸溪县| 静宁县| 玛纳斯县| 克东县| 错那县| 隆尧县| 寻乌县| 会理县| 和静县| 城市| 太原市| 海宁市| 泌阳县| 尼玛县| 勐海县| 洛南县| 定结县| 沾益县| 加查县| 宜良县| 甘谷县| 万山特区| 金昌市| 客服| 大庆市| 正宁县| 扶绥县| 东兴市| 章丘市| 桦南县| 桐庐县| 游戏| 昌江| 汝阳县| 闵行区|