對(duì)于雅思寫作的備考，了解自己當(dāng)前的水平很重要。 以小作文，如果老師給你的打分是6分，那你一定很想知道對(duì)應(yīng)的7分甚至8分主體段長(zhǎng)什么樣子。

讓人類老師來(lái)做這個(gè)事情費(fèi)時(shí)費(fèi)力，會(huì)很辛苦，因?yàn)橐凑漳愕脑牡乃枷雭?lái)改寫的難度是不小的。

但是，如果讓GPT-4來(lái)做，就是小菜一碟。

下面我下指令給GPT-4，讓它以下面的圖表題分別給出5，6，7和8分的小作文，并解釋原因。

The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

先是各分?jǐn)?shù)段作文及英文解釋：

各分?jǐn)?shù)段作文：

**Band 5:**

1. The given table presents data about how consumers in five different countries spent their money on various items in the year 2002.

2. Overall, the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco was in Turkey, while the least was in Italy. Similarly, the maximum and minimum expenditures on clothing and footwear were seen in Italy and Sweden, respectively.

3. In terms of food, drinks, and tobacco, Turkey spent the most with a percentage of 32.14%, followed by Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and lastly Italy, which spent only 16.36%.

4. When looking at clothing and footwear, Italy was the biggest spender with 9%, while the lowest was Sweden with 5.40%. For leisure and education, Turkey again spent the most at 4.35%, with Ireland spending the least at 2.21%.

**Band 6:**

1. The table provides a comparative view of consumer expenditure on various commodities in five distinct countries during 2002.

2. Overall, Turkey reported the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco, whereas Italy had the lowest. Conversely, Italy had the highest spending on clothing and footwear, while Sweden reported the lowest.

3. In more detail, Turkey led the pack with a hefty 32.14% of their spending directed towards food, drinks, and tobacco, followed by Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and finally Italy with a mere 16.36% expenditure on the same.

4. On the other hand, Italy emerged as the top spender on clothing and footwear with a 9% share, while Sweden lagged behind with a meagre 5.40%. As far as leisure and education are concerned, Turkey led with a 4.35% expenditure, with Ireland trailing at 2.21%.

**Band 7:**

1. The table elucidates the patterns of consumer expenditure on a trio of sectors across five diverse nations in 2002.

2. Overall, the bulk of spending on food, drinks, and tobacco was reported in Turkey, while Italy exhibited the lowest spending. In contrast, Italy topped the list for clothing and footwear expenditure, with Sweden at the bottom.

3. Diving deeper, Turkey allocated a substantial 32.14% of its total expenditure to food, drinks, and tobacco, followed by Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and Italy, which earmarked just 16.36% for these items.

4. Conversely, Italy devoted 9% of its spending to clothing and footwear, nearly twice the amount set aside by Sweden, which contributed a paltry 5.40%. With respect to leisure and education, Turkey again led the pack with a 4.35% expenditure, while Ireland spent the least at 2.21%.

**Band 8:**

1. The table furnishes an in-depth comparison of consumer spending habits across food, drinks, tobacco, clothing, footwear, and leisure and education in five different countries during the year 2002.

2. Overall, it is evident that Turkey demonstrated the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco, whereas Italy reported the minimum. On the contrary, Italy led in spending on clothing and footwear, with Sweden bringing up the rear.

3. A closer examination reveals that Turkey dedicated a significant 32.14% of their total spending to food, drinks, and tobacco, substantially more than Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and particularly Italy, which committed a minimal 16.36% to these commodities.

4. In a reversal of fortunes, Italy led the way in the clothing and footwear category with an expenditure of 9%, almost double that of Sweden, which allocated only 5.40%. The trend of spending on leisure and education was dominated by Turkey at 4.35%, nearly twice the amount invested by Ireland, the least spending country at 2.21%.

解釋：

**Band 5:**

"The given table presents data about how consumers in five different countries spent their money on various items in the year 2002."

This introductory sentence is a simple paraphrase of the prompt, which is expected at this band level. However, it doesn't add any significant details or insights about the data.

"Overall, the highest spending on food, drinks, and tobacco was in Turkey, while the least was in Italy. Similarly, the maximum and minimum expenditures on clothing and footwear were seen in Italy and Sweden, respectively."

The overview provides the main trends but is quite basic and doesn't highlight the key comparisons or anomalies.

In the following sentences, the candidate presents the data without any clear logical organization. The vocabulary ("highest", "lowest") and sentence structures are quite simple, and there are no complex sentences or advanced grammatical structures.

This response is a Band 5 because it meets the minimum requirements of the task: it presents the data and provides an overview. However, it doesn't showcase a wide range of vocabulary, complex sentences, or a high degree of coherence and cohesion.

**Band 6:**

The response at this band level begins to demonstrate a clearer structure and more detailed overview. The candidate uses more varied vocabulary (e.g., "reported", "expenditure") and more complex grammatical structures (e.g., "whereas"). The candidate also starts to make more detailed comparisons between the countries.

This response is a Band 6 because it goes beyond merely presenting the data and provides more detailed analysis. It shows a wider range of vocabulary and more complex sentences, though there might still be some grammatical errors.

**Band 7:**

At this band level, the candidate provides a comprehensive overview and detailed comparisons. The candidate uses advanced vocabulary (e.g., "allocated", "earmarked") and complex grammatical structures (e.g., "nearly twice the amount set aside by Sweden"). The response is well-organized, with clear transitions between ideas.

This response is a Band 7 because it fulfills all aspects of the task with few errors. It uses a wide range of vocabulary and complex sentences accurately, and it demonstrates a high level of coherence and cohesion.

**Band 8:**

At this band level, the candidate provides an in-depth analysis of the data. The candidate uses sophisticated vocabulary (e.g., "furnishes", "allocated", "demonstrated") and complex grammatical structures (e.g., "in a reversal of fortunes"). The response is highly coherent, with logical progression and clear transitions between ideas.

This response is a Band 8 because it excels in all aspects of the task. It uses a wide range of vocabulary and complex sentences accurately and appropriately, and it is highly coherent and cohesive.

中文版翻譯和解釋

這里給出中文版翻譯和解釋，方便同學(xué)們能更清楚和直觀的了解各主要分?jǐn)?shù)段的一個(gè)典型的雅思小作文長(zhǎng)什么樣和其中的差別：

**5分?jǐn)?shù)段：**

"這個(gè)表格展示了2002年五個(gè)不同國(guó)家的消費(fèi)者在不同項(xiàng)目上的消費(fèi)情況。"

這個(gè)引言句子是對(duì)提示的簡(jiǎn)單釋義，這在這個(gè)分?jǐn)?shù)段是預(yù)期的。然而，它沒(méi)有添加關(guān)于數(shù)據(jù)的任何重要細(xì)節(jié)或洞察。

"總的來(lái)說(shuō)，土耳其在食物、飲料和煙草上的支出最高，而意大利的支出最低。相似地，衣物和鞋類的支出在意大利最高，而在瑞典最低。"

概述提供了主要的趨勢(shì)，但是相當(dāng)基礎(chǔ)，沒(méi)有突出關(guān)鍵的比較或異常。

在接下來(lái)的句子中，考生呈現(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù)，但沒(méi)有任何明確的邏輯組織。詞匯（"支出最多"，"支出最少"）和句子結(jié)構(gòu)相當(dāng)簡(jiǎn)單，沒(méi)有復(fù)雜的句子或高級(jí)的語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu)。

這個(gè)回答是5分，因?yàn)樗鼭M足任務(wù)的最低要求：它呈現(xiàn)了數(shù)據(jù)并提供了概述。然而，它沒(méi)有展示出廣泛的詞匯，復(fù)雜的句子，或高度的連貫性和粘連性。

**6分?jǐn)?shù)段：**

這個(gè)分?jǐn)?shù)段的回答開始展示出更清晰的結(jié)構(gòu)和更詳細(xì)的概述?？忌褂酶嘧兓脑~匯（例如，"報(bào)告"，"支出"）和更復(fù)雜的語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu)（例如，"而"）?？忌查_始做更詳細(xì)的國(guó)家之間的比較。

這個(gè)回答是6分，因?yàn)樗搅藘H僅呈現(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù)，并提供了更詳細(xì)的分析。它顯示了廣泛的詞匯和更復(fù)雜的句子，盡管可能仍然存在一些語(yǔ)法錯(cuò)誤。

**7分?jǐn)?shù)段：**

在這個(gè)分?jǐn)?shù)段，考生提供了全面的概述和詳細(xì)的比較。考生使用高級(jí)詞匯（例如，"分配"，"指定"）和復(fù)雜的語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu)（例如，"幾乎是瑞典的兩倍"）?；卮鹗怯薪M織的，有清晰的思想轉(zhuǎn)換。

這個(gè)回答是7分，因?yàn)樗院苌俚腻e(cuò)誤完成了任務(wù)的所有方面。它使用廣泛的詞匯和準(zhǔn)確地使用復(fù)雜的句子，它展示了高度的連貫性和粘連性。

**8分?jǐn)?shù)段：**

在這個(gè)分?jǐn)?shù)段，考生提供了對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)的深入分析?？忌褂脧?fù)雜的詞匯（例如，"提供"，"分配"，"展示"）和復(fù)雜的語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu)（例如，"在運(yùn)氣逆轉(zhuǎn)中"）?；卮鸶叨冗B貫，有邏輯的進(jìn)展和清晰的思想轉(zhuǎn)換。

這個(gè)回答是8分，因?yàn)樗谌蝿?wù)的所有方面都表現(xiàn)出色。它準(zhǔn)確和適當(dāng)?shù)厥褂昧藦V泛的詞匯和復(fù)雜的句子，它是高度連貫和粘連的。

通過(guò)檢查這些示例，中國(guó)的雅思考生可以理解不同分?jǐn)?shù)段之間在質(zhì)量和復(fù)雜性方面的區(qū)別。他們可以看到如何通過(guò)使用更高級(jí)的詞匯，更復(fù)雜的句子，以及提供更詳細(xì)和連貫的數(shù)據(jù)分析來(lái)提高他們的回答。

本文涉及的指令均收集于雅思終結(jié)者ChatGPT指令集。